The Question of Evil in the Guide for the Perplexed and its Talmudic Background

Authors

  • José Costa Université de Paris II – Sorbonne nouvelle

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/sefarad.010.010

Keywords:

Maimonides, Moral Philosophy, Rabbinic Literature, mu ͑tazilism

Abstract


At first sight, the question of evil is regarded in the Guide for the Perplexed in a paradoxical manner. Thus, in Guide I, 2, Maimonides examines the notions of good and evil as subjective evaluations possessing neither the rigour not the exactness of the notions of true and false. However, the question of evil occupies an essential place in the Guide, as various modern authors have shown. This question is important to Maimonides because he is, in this respect, the heir of the rabbinic tradition and his conception of evil is largely based on an interaction with the Talmudic and Midrašic texts. Therefore, we would like to review thirty-nine rabbinic ‘quotes’ which appear in chapters 8 to 24 in the third part of the Guide and deal with the origin of evil, the meaning of suffering and the evil inclination. Maimonides reappropriates the midrašim that are susceptible of being in agreement with his rationalist positions and also quotes some rabbinic traditions that are too close to mu ͑tazilism, undoubtedly aware of the more profound resemblance that exists between the rabbinic and mu ͑tazilite doctrines of evil and retribution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

'Abd al-Jabb_r, Al-Mughn_ f_ abw_b al-tawh__d wa-l-'adl, 16 vol., le Caire, 1960-1969.

Aron, R., Le Marxisme de Marx, Paris, 2002.

Baer, Y. F., Yisra'el ba-'amim, Jérusalem, 1955.

Baer, Y. F., «Be'ayat ha-dat bi-yme ha-h_ashmona'im», in Meh_qarim u-massot be-toldot 'am yisra'el, T. I, Jérusalem, 1985, p. 49-77.

Baer, Y. F., «Ha-yesodot ha-hist_oriyyim shel ha-halakha», chapitre 3, 4, «Hilkhot t_ohora u-ferishut we-dine ha-isiyyim», in Id., p. 346-354.

Benor, A., «Modelim la-habanat ha-ra' be-More Nebukhim», 'Iyyun, 34, 1985, p. 3-33.

Blau, L., « Satan », in The Jewish Encyclopedia, T. 11, New-York, 1901, p. 68-71.

Blidstein, G. J., «Where Do We Stand in the Study of Maimonidean Halakhah?», in I. Twersky (éd.), Studies in Maimonides, Cambridge-Londres, 1990, p. 4-13.

Blumberg, H., «Theories of Evil in Medieval Jewish Philosophy», Hebrew Union College Annual, 43, 1972, p. 149-168.

Braude, W., «Maimonides's Attitude to Midrash», in C. Berlin (éd.), Studies in Jewish Bibliography, History, and Literature in Honor of I. Edward Kiev, New York, 1971, p. 75-82.

Cook, J., «The Origin of the Tradition of the yes_er ha-t_ob and yes_er ha-ra'», Journal for the Study of Judaism, 38, 2007, p. 80-91. doi:10.1163/157006307X170634

Costa, J., L'au-delà et la résurrection dans la littérature rabbinique ancienne, Paris-Louvain, 2004.

Curley, E. M., «Maimonides, Spinoza, and the Book of Job», in H. Ravven et al. (éd.), Jewish Themes in Spinoza's Philosophy, Albany, 2002, p. 147-186.

Diamond, E., Holy Men and Hunger Artists: Fasting and Asceticism in Rabbinic Culture, Oxford-New York, 2004.

Diamond, J. A., Maimonides and the Hermeneutics of Concealment. Deciphering Scripture and Midrash in The Guide of the Perplexed, Albany, 2002.

Dobbs-Weinstein, I., «Matter as creature and matter as the source of evil: Maimonides and Aquinas», in L. E. Goodman (éd.), Neoplatonism and Jewish Thought, Albany, 1992, p. 217-235. PMCid:1481224

Emunot we-de'ot, éd. Y. Kafih, Jérusalem, 1970.

Eisen, R., The Book of Job in Medieval Jewish Philosophy, Oxford, 2004.

Faur, J., «Meqor h_iyyuban shel ha-mis_wot be-da'at ha-Rambam», Tarbiz, 38, 1968, p. 43-53.

Fraade, S. D., «Ascetical Aspects of Ancient Judaism», in A. Green (éd.), Jewish Spirituality: From the Bible through the Middle Ages, New York, 1987, p. 253-288.

Geoffroy, M., Discours décisif d'Averroès, Paris, 1996.

Goodman, L. E., «Maimonides's Response to Sa'adya Gaon's Theodicy and their Islamic Backgrounds», in W. M. Brinner et al. (éd.), Studies in Islamic and Judaic Traditions, II, Atlanta, 1988, p. 3-22.

Goodman, L. E., The Book of Theodicy. Translation and commentary on the Book of Job by Saadiah Ben Joseph Al-Fayy_m_, New Haven-Londres, 1988.

Guttmann, M., Das religionsphilosophische System der Mutakallim_n nach dem Bericht des Maimonides, Breslau, 1885.

Halbertal, M., «Ilmale miqra katub i efshar le-omro», Tarbiz, 68, 1999, p. 39-59.

Harvey, W. Z., «Maimonides and Spinoza on the Knowledge of Good and Evil», Binah, 2, 1989, p. 131-146.

Harvey, W. Z., «Two Jewish Approaches to Evil in History», in S. T. Katz (éd.), The Impact of Holocaust in Jewish Theology, 2005, p. 194-201.

Heemskerk, M. T., Suffering in the Mu'tazilite Theology. 'Abd al-Jabb_r's Teaching on Pain and Divine Justice, Leyde, 2000.

Jospe, R., «Sefer Iyyob ke-More Nebukhim miqra'i», in M. Hallamish (éd.), Da'at ha-Rambam. Yalqut_ ma'amarim be-h_eqer mishnat ha-Rambam, Ramat Gan, 2004, p. 205-217.

Jung, C. G., Aïon. Etudes sur la phénoménologie du Soi, Paris, 1983.

Kafih, Y., More Nebukhim, Jérusalem, 1972.

Kalman, J., «Job the Patient/ Maimonides the Physician: A Case Study in the Unity of Maimonides's Thought», Association for Jewish Studies Review, 32, 2008, p. 117-140.

Kasher, H., «Demuto we-de'otaw shel Iyyob be-More Nebukhim», in M. Hallamish (éd.), Da'at ha-Rambam. Yalqut_ ma'amarim be-h_eqer mishnat ha-Rambam, Ramat Gan, 2004, p. 225-231.

Kraemer, D., Responses to Suffering in Classical Rabbinic Literature, New York, 1995.

Kramer, J., Das Problem des Wunders im Zusammenhang mit der Providenz von Saadia bis Maimuni, Strasbourg, 1903.

Kravitz, L., «Maimonides and Job: Method of Moreh», Hebrew Union College Annual, 38, 1968, p. 149-158.

Leaman, O., Evil and Suffering in Jewish Philosophy, Cambridge, 1995.

Lévy, R., La divine insouciance. Etude des doctrines de la providence d'après Maïmonide, Paris, 2008.

Mack, H., «Ella mashal haya», Iyyob be-sifrut ha-bayit ha-sheni u-be-'ene H_azal, Ramat-Gan, 2004.

Midrash Rabba ha-mebo'ar, édité par le Mekhon ha-midrash ha-mebo'ar, T. I, Jérusalem, 1983.

Motzkin, A. L., «Maimonides and Spinoza on Good and Evil», Daat, 24, 1990, p. V-XXIII.

Munk, S., Le Guide des Egarés, 3 vol., Paris, 1856-1866.

Munk, S. et Joel, I., Dal_lat al- H__'ir_n, Jerusalem, 1929.

Naiweld, R., L'anti-sujet. Le rapport entre l'individu et la Loi dans la littérature rabbinique classique, Thèse de doctorat de l'EHESS, Paris, 2009 (en cours de publication).

Niewöhner, F., «Ein schwieriges Maimonides-Zitat im Tractatus theologico-philosophicus und Hermann Cohens Kritik an Spinoza», Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 31, 1977, p. 618-626.

Pines, S., «Truth and Falsehood Versus Good and Evil. A Study in Jewish and General Philosophy in Connection with the Guide of the Perplexed, I, 2», in I. Twersky (éd.), Studies in Maimonides, Cambridge-Londres, 1990, p. 95-157.

Porter, F. C., «The Yecer Hara, a Study in the Jewish Doctrine of Sin», in Biblical and Semitic Studies: Yale Historical and Critical Contributions to Biblical Science, New York, 1901, p. 93-156.

Rabinowitz, L. I., «Satan», in Encyclopedia Judaica, T. 14, Jérusalem, 1971, p. 903-906.

Reines, A. J., «Maimonides's Concepts of Providence and Theodicy», Hebrew Union College Annual, 43, 1972, p. 169-206.

Rosen-Zvi, I., «Evil Desire and Sexuality: A Chapter in Talmudic Anthropology», Theory and Criticism, 14, 1999, p. 55-84.

Rosen-Zvi, I., «"Dibbera tora ke-neged ha-yes_er": De-be Rabbi Yishma'el u-meqoro shel yes_er ha-ra'», Tarbiz, 2006-2007, p. 41-79.

Rynhold, D., «Good and Evil, Truth and Falsity: Maimonides and Moral Cognitivism», Trumah, 12, 2002, p. 163-182.

Saadia Ben Josef Al-Fayyoûmî, Œuvres complètes, publiées sous la direction de J. Derenbourg, vol. 5, Version arabe du livre de Job, Paris, 1899.

Samuelson, N. M., «Theodicy», in D. Cohn-Sherbok (éd.), Theodicy, Lewiston, New York, 1997, p. 1-17.

Satlow, M., «"And on the Earth You Shall Sleep" : Talmud Torah and Rabbinic Asceticism», Journal of Religion, 83, 2003, p. 204-224. doi:10.1086/491277

Schäfer, P., Rivalität zwischen Engeln und Menschen. Untersuchungen zur rabbinischen Engelvorstellung, Berlin-New York, 1975.

Schofer, J. W., The Making of the Sage. A Study in Rabbinic Ethics, Madison-Londres, 2005, p. 84-119.

Schwartz, M., More Nebukhim, Tel Aviv, 2002.

Schwarzschild, S. S., «Do Noachites Have to Believe in Revelation ? A Passage in Dispute between Maimonides, Spinoza, Mendelssohn and H. Cohen. A Contribution to a Jewish View of Natural Law», Jewish Quarterly Review, 53, 1962, p. 30-65. doi:10.2307/1453421

Shanks, A. E., «Art, Argument and Ambiguity in the Talmud: Conflicting Conceptions of the Evil Impulse in b. Sukkah 51b-52a», Hebrew Union College Annual, 73, 2003, p. 97-132.

Touati, C., «Les deux théories de Maïmonide sur la providence», in Prophètes, talmudistes, philosophes, Paris, 1990, p. 187-200.

Twersky, I., Introduction to the Code of Maimonides (Mishneh Torah), New Haven-Londres, 1980.

Urbach, E., The Sages, Their Concepts and Beliefs, 2 vol., Jérusalem, 1975.

Urbach, E., «Asqezis we-yissurin be-torat H_azal», in Me-'olamam shel h_akhamim. Qobes_ meh_qarim, Jerusalem, 1988, p. 437-458.

Vajda, G., «La philosophie et la théologie de Joseph Ibn Çaddiq», Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 17, 1949, p. 93-181.

Wolfson, H. A., The Philosophy of the Kal_m, Cambridge, 1976.

Wolfson, H. A., Repercussions of the Kal_m in Jewish Philosophy, Londres-Cambridge, 1979.

Zucker, M., 'Al targum Rab Sa'adya Ga'on la-tora, New York, 1959.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

Costa, J. (2010). The Question of Evil in the Guide for the Perplexed and its Talmudic Background. Sefarad, 70(2), 329–374. https://doi.org/10.3989/sefarad.010.010

Issue

Section

Studies